Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Weekly Reading 10

How does the project detailed in the video support research process that consistent with the kind of research people encounter in the workplace?

        In a way, this project reminds me of a citizen's journal.  Research had to be done to raise awareness for deforestation.  Nobody is just taking a picture of grasslands and "guessing" that a forest used to be there. First-hand authentic research had to be done.  Either the deforestation was experienced primarily, or careful research was collected to prove the effects of deforestation.  The research is authentic in meaningful, much like the research people encounter in the workplace.  It is community-based.


How does this project support new literacies?

       In the course reading What Wikipedia can teach us about New Media Literacies it was stated that, "Students are responsible for the accuracy of information they provide, and they cannot point to Wikipedia or any similar source that may appear in the future to escape the consequences of errors."  In the project, the presenter is responsible for the accuracy of information and delivery of the message.

       The project notes state,"Leveraging the power of social networking, collaborative online tools, and new pedagogies, the collaboration was chartered with proving a model by which young people could demonstrate powerful 21st century skills by taking meaningful, powerful action. Now with hundreds of thousands of students across the planet, this project is changing lives and defining what learning could be."  In the course reading New Literacies and 21st Century Technologies, it was stated, "Finally, networked communication technologies such as the Internet provide the most powerful capabilities for information and communication we have ever seen, permitting access to people and information in ways and at speeds never before possible."  The connection is obvious between both of these quotations.  New literacies though the Internet have taken this authentic project to a whole new audience so vast.  This project encorporates new literacies within social networking and online tools.

Week 10 Final Citizen Journal

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Weekly Reading #9

Quote:
"Some debate exists over whether educators should embrace SNS and use it for learning
purposes or whether they should leave it for youth to have as their own form of networking
and communicating. Will the fun of social networking be lost if it is incorporated into 
classrooms for different purposes than what students normally use it or will this mode engage 

students further in the learning process?"

Explanation of Quote:
I chose this quote because I never considered "losing the fun" when incorporating Social Networking Sites.  After last weeks reading, I was completely on board for incorporating social networking in school.  I still think this.  However, this did have me consider to not make it something miserable.  We don't want to use social networking to post a boring 10 page, double-spaced paper, with no discussion.  We don't want to lose the "social" aspect of SNS.  I think teachers just need to teach proper usage and use SNS as a way to have digital classroom discussions and sharing.  It is important to not completely blend home life with school life.  You're students don't need to see your Facebook pictures from your recent vacation.  Its the enjoyable social environment that needs duplicated in the classroom.  It's the fact that the student that has been sitting quietly in the corner all year, might share and express themselves through social networking.

Additional Reference:
Source: http://www.shinyshiny.tv/24-pupil-fb-friend.jpg

Explanation of Additional Reference:
Agreeing that Social Networking would be beneficial in the classroom doesn't mean that all your private home social networking sites now need to be in the classroom.  Teachers should ask themselves, "What make social networking enjoyable to my students and what aspects of that can enter the classroom?"

Questions:
1. What makes a literacy practice a "new literacy"?

  • New literacies are not merely technical or ‘operational’ competencies but are situated within a new mindset about knowledge. Lankshear and Knobel (2006) distinguish new literacies from conventional literacies in that the more a literacy practice privileges participation over publishing, distributed expertise over centralized enterprise, collective intelligence over individual possessive intelligence, collaboration over individuated authorship, dispersion over scarcity, sharing over ownership, innovation and evolution over stability and fixity … the more we should regard it as a ‘new’ literacy. (p. 21)

2. How does might Citizen Journalism support the development of "new literacies"?

  • Citizen Journalism definitely "privileges participation over publishing, distributed expertise over centralized enterprise, collective intelligence over individual possessive intelligence, collaboration over individuated authorship, dispersion over scarcity, sharing over ownership, innovation and evolution over stability and fixity."
  • Citizen Journalism involves high levels of collaboration and sharing.

3. What is critical literacy and how does your Citizen Journalism project encourage critical literacy? How might you change your project to encourage critical literacy?

  • "A critical literacy framework views discourse, including information, through a political, social, and economic lens (Fabos, 2004; Kapitzke, 2003; Lankshear & McClaren, 1993). Teachers of critical literacy encourage their students to deconstruct the text by understanding the foundation and conflicts that lie beneath the surface content and the relationship that the text holds with other text(s). They encourage readers to examine issues of class, gender, race, culture, and hegemony in the aim to advance democracy. Students need to understand that all text including the complex text of the internet is built on economic, political, and ideological interests (Selwyn, 2009)."
  • Citizen Journalism causes students to sharpen their analytic skills.  Students search for valid answers. They conduct their own primary research.  In a way, they shape their projects based off their own ideological interests.


4. What problems may arise when students use Web 2.0 tools for learning in school and how might teachers capitalize on these opportunities to promote information literacy?

  • "In partaking in collaborative wiki contributions, problems may arise surrounding ownership of work. Does the whole story belong to all students who contributed to it? Do students only have ownership rights to the portions on which they contributed? These questions need discussion and facilitation at the outset of such projects. Researchers claim that infusing new genres such as wikis, blogs and txting into content learning, not just language arts, needs more attention (Selwyn, 2009; Walker, 2010)."
  • Teachers can capitalize on these opportunities to answer these questions.  Teachers can show students how to responsibly use and browse Web 2.0 information.  


Citation:
Asselin, M. & Moayeri, M. (2011). Practical Strategies: The Participatory Classroom: Web 2.0 in the Classroom. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 19(2).

Week 9, Citizen Journalism draft

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Weekly Reading 8

Quote:
"Consider first the concept of lifelong learning. Almost without exception, the literature notes that the ultimate goal of IL is to impart the skill of lifelong learning or learning how to learn" (Grafstein, 2002).

Why this Quote?: 
I agree that that we need to provide active learning environments that prepare students for lifelong learning.  Students that know how to learn know how information is organized.  If students is not familiar with how information is organized in the 21st century, they will have trouble learning the information in today's society.  Drill memorization is not going to impart the skill of lifelong learning.  Active learning environments with the current literacies of today will provide lifelong learning opportunities.

Extra Related Resource:
Image Source: http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/bloom1(1).gif

I chose this image because I thought it really "nailed" what information literacy incorporates.  It's not just library instruction; It's not just the print that you read; It's everything that can be synthesized and evaluated in life!


Questions:
  1. What is the difference between IL and BI and why is this distinction important?
    • IL stands for Information literacy and refers to all forms of literacy, period.  BI refers to bibliographic information; this is much more specific to traditional library sources.
  2. Why should classroom faculty teach IL?
    • Teaching Information Literacy (IL) will help bridge the gap between school and workplace.  Often times students are just taught Bibliographic Information (BI) in school and that knowledge stays in school.  Students need to know the literacies in the world around them so they can "conquer the world." 
  3. What is the role of classroom faculty in developing information literacy?
    • The roll of classroom faculty in developing IL is to develop the critical thinking skills that students need not only in school, but outside of school as well.  Students need to know how to evaluated all types of literacies in their world. 

Article Reference:
Grafstein, A. (2002, July). A Discipline-Based Approach to Information Literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), pp. 197-204. Retrieved July 11, 2013, from http://westmont.edu/_offices/provost/documents/Senate/Full/2009-2010/Discipline-Based%20Approach%20to%20Information%20Literacy.pdf

Continuation of Citizen Journal

I made some edits to my TRACKSTAR.

I also created a Storyboard to help guide students along with the process.

The Digital Media Tools used will be PhotoStory, and Google Docs (for StoryBoard creation and easy sharing).

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Weekly Reading #7

Quote
  • "While students and teachers noted some level of engagement at the start of the project during the planning phase, it wasn’t until the filming and editing that engagement peaked. This level of engagement at this point was quite unexpected by the classroom teacher, who predicted that students would be most cognitively engaged during the planning phase (Addlinton)." 
Explanation of Quote
  •   It is important for us to realize that even if we "think" we know how our students will react, we will not know until we try.  Teachers felt that the pre-discussion and pre-activities would be most engaging. However, the challenges of using a camera, interviewing people and finally editing the work proved more engaging for students. I thought it was interesting that students found the reflection time as "monotonous overtime."  Although class discussions and reflections are important, it just goes to show how implementing new technology can create an engaging and authentic learning environment. The project reported here demonstrates that students may be behaviorally, cognitively and emotionally engaged when undertaking technology-rich projects.
Questions:
  • 1. How might your citizen journalism project resemble a technology rich project?
    • The students are using new resources.  They are exploring the internet through TrackStar. They are conducting primary research and interviews.  These type of of technological tasks can create engaging and authentic environments.
  • 2. What did you learn about successful implementation of technology rich projects?
    • As mentioned above, 
      students may be behaviorally, cognitively and emotionally engaged when undertaking technology-rich projects.  
    • I also learned to be careful. Using new strategies that may improve engagement, such as cooperative learning, are likely to be less successful if students are not carefully scaffolded in learning how to learn in new ways.
Extra Resource

Resource Description
  • I found this video of a Middle Schools News cast. What a technology rich broadcast!  I guarantee that high engagement and learning took place in these news broadcast.  I would love to have an elective "NEWS" class for my 8th graders to take to create this for the school on weekly or biweekly basis.  In fact, I plan on sharing this with my principal.  How cool!
Article Citation
Addlington, R., & Harvey, H. (2010, April 6-9). ACEC2010 - ENGAGING YOUNG LEARNERS: THE MULTI-FACETED AND CHANGEABLE NATURE OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN TECHNOLOGY-RICH LEARNING PROJECTS. ACEC2010: DIGITAL DIVERSITY CONFERENCE. Retrieved July 7, 2013, from http://acec2010.acce.edu.au/sites/acec2010.info/files/proposal/172/acec2010engagingyounglearners.pdf

TrackStar for Citizen Journal

link to TrackStar